Volcanic ash found in canals may explain how cities survived with poor soil.
Even at ancient Maya cities far from volcanoes, ash rained down relatively frequently, a "spectacularly important" new study says. 
The finding could explain how these ancient metropolises survived—and even prospered—despite having poor soil.
Extending south from southern Mexico, through Guatemala, and into northern Belize, the Maya Empire prospered from about A.D. 250 to 900, when it crumbled. (See an interactive map of the Maya civilization.)
Recently  scientists discovered a distinct beige clay mineral in ruined canals at  Guatemala's Tikal archaeological site—once the largest city of the  southern Maya lowlands. The mineral, a type of smectite, derives only  from the breakdown of volcanic ash.
Using chemical fingerprinting techniques, the team showed that the smectite at  Tikal didn't come from dust ferried from Africa by air currents—the  common assumption—but rather from volcanoes within Guatemala and in what  are now El Salvador, Honduras, and Mexico.
Once-in-a-Lifetime Eruptions? 
Prior  to the new discovery, it was known that highland Maya cities closer to  volcanoes could be drastically affected by eruptions. For example, the  Maya village of Chalchuapa in El Salvador was completely buried when the  nearby Ilopango volcano erupted in the sixth century A.D.
But  until now, it's been unclear what effect, if any, eruptions had on  lowland Maya cities hundreds of miles away. Now it appears that air  currents regularly carried volcanic ash many miles away from the  region's volcanoes. That's not especially surprising, considering that  winds often carry dust all the way across the Atlantic Ocean, Tankersley  said.
Tankersley and his team think their ash  samples were deposited in Tikal over a 2,000-year period, from about 340  B.C. to A.D. 990. There's no way yet to determine just how many  eruptions occurred, their frequency, or which volcanoes the ash came  from, he said.
"If you were a Mayan, you would  probably have experienced at least one of these events during your  lifetime, and perhaps more, during certain periods," said Tankersley,  who presented the team's findings at a meeting of the Society for American Archaeology in Sacramento, California, in late March.
Ashfall has been reported at Tikal as recently as the 1960s, according to University of Colorado anthropologist  Payson Sheets.
Supersoil Saved Maya Cities?
The  new findings are "spectacularly important," Sheets said, because they  could help explain a central mystery about lowland Maya cities.
"The  literature consistently talks about the soils in these places as being  very weak and fragile and nonproductive because they were derived from  weathered limestone, which does not form a very good soil," said Sheets,  an expert on the effects of volcanoes on Maya culture.
And  yet archeological evidence suggests cities such as Tikal were able to  support between 160 to 230 people per square mile (400 to 600 people per  square kilometer).
"This is much denser than we  would have thought possible from relatively poor tropical soil," said  Sheets, who wasn't involved in the Tikal ash study.
But  if the Maya-lowland soils were dusted with volcanic ash every few years  or even decades, they would have been periodically enriched.
Volcanic  ash can help make soil more fertile by increasing its permeability and  porosity, thus improving its ability to retain water. Volcanic ash is  also a source of plant-friendly minerals such as iron and magnesium.
"Periodic enrichment provides some of the answer for how those soils can support such dense populations," Sheets said.
Read more @ http://bit.ly/eZ0gGe

 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment